<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: An Evangelical Manifesto</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ehritzema.wordpress.com/2008/05/10/an-evangelical-manifesto/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ehritzema.wordpress.com/2008/05/10/an-evangelical-manifesto/</link>
	<description>Your source for all things Elliot</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 02 Jan 2010 14:00:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: timothycairns</title>
		<link>http://ehritzema.wordpress.com/2008/05/10/an-evangelical-manifesto/#comment-135</link>
		<dc:creator>timothycairns</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2008 14:26:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ehritzema.wordpress.com/?p=133#comment-135</guid>
		<description>sorry for my bad typing I am trying to balance a baby and type at the same time - which also accounts for my brief replies!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>sorry for my bad typing I am trying to balance a baby and type at the same time &#8211; which also accounts for my brief replies!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: timothycairns</title>
		<link>http://ehritzema.wordpress.com/2008/05/10/an-evangelical-manifesto/#comment-134</link>
		<dc:creator>timothycairns</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2008 14:25:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ehritzema.wordpress.com/?p=133#comment-134</guid>
		<description>Elliot,

he quotes you highlight are classic leftist Christian language - oh we are so inclusive - whilst they proceed to exclude anyone they disagree with! its the way Regent functioned for the 4 years I was there! i</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Elliot,</p>
<p>he quotes you highlight are classic leftist Christian language &#8211; oh we are so inclusive &#8211; whilst they proceed to exclude anyone they disagree with! its the way Regent functioned for the 4 years I was there! i</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: elliot</title>
		<link>http://ehritzema.wordpress.com/2008/05/10/an-evangelical-manifesto/#comment-131</link>
		<dc:creator>elliot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2008 04:26:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ehritzema.wordpress.com/?p=133#comment-131</guid>
		<description>Tim,

I can&#039;t see how the document is &quot;left leaning.&quot;  In fact, the document says &quot;it would be no improvement to respond to a weakening of the religious right with a rejuvenation of the religious left.&quot;  Do you see something I don&#039;t in the document?  It seems that the writers went out of their way to avoid the perception that they were left-leaning.

I&#039;m also not aware of the signatories as a group being particularly leftist.  Do you know something I don&#039;t?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tim,</p>
<p>I can&#8217;t see how the document is &#8220;left leaning.&#8221;  In fact, the document says &#8220;it would be no improvement to respond to a weakening of the religious right with a rejuvenation of the religious left.&#8221;  Do you see something I don&#8217;t in the document?  It seems that the writers went out of their way to avoid the perception that they were left-leaning.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m also not aware of the signatories as a group being particularly leftist.  Do you know something I don&#8217;t?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: timothycairns</title>
		<link>http://ehritzema.wordpress.com/2008/05/10/an-evangelical-manifesto/#comment-130</link>
		<dc:creator>timothycairns</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 May 2008 23:38:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ehritzema.wordpress.com/?p=133#comment-130</guid>
		<description>the whole document smacks of the left leaning evangelicals of America fighting to be relevant</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the whole document smacks of the left leaning evangelicals of America fighting to be relevant</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: elliot</title>
		<link>http://ehritzema.wordpress.com/2008/05/10/an-evangelical-manifesto/#comment-122</link>
		<dc:creator>elliot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 04:04:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ehritzema.wordpress.com/?p=133#comment-122</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the comment, Eric.  It&#039;s a good opportunity to clarify what I was trying to say, and to point out one place where the manifesto is deficient.

I took the word &quot;politicization&quot; directly from the manifesto, but I didn&#039;t realize until your comment that the authors should have been more clear about what they were criticizing.  I meant by &quot;politicization&quot; exactly what you said: interpreting the political life of Christians somewhere along the spectrum of right to left.  In other words, I meant what politics seems to be limited to in the 21st-century U.S.  It seems that the authors of the manifesto mean the same thing, but it would be nice if they came out and said so.  I&#039;m inclined to give them a break: after all, they&#039;re already trying to save the word &quot;evangelical.&quot;  Trying to save the word &quot;politics&quot; as well would be too large a task for a 20-page document.

But you are right: in the classical sense, Christian faith is certainly political.  It deals with human affairs, and how to organize life together.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the comment, Eric.  It&#8217;s a good opportunity to clarify what I was trying to say, and to point out one place where the manifesto is deficient.</p>
<p>I took the word &#8220;politicization&#8221; directly from the manifesto, but I didn&#8217;t realize until your comment that the authors should have been more clear about what they were criticizing.  I meant by &#8220;politicization&#8221; exactly what you said: interpreting the political life of Christians somewhere along the spectrum of right to left.  In other words, I meant what politics seems to be limited to in the 21st-century U.S.  It seems that the authors of the manifesto mean the same thing, but it would be nice if they came out and said so.  I&#8217;m inclined to give them a break: after all, they&#8217;re already trying to save the word &#8220;evangelical.&#8221;  Trying to save the word &#8220;politics&#8221; as well would be too large a task for a 20-page document.</p>
<p>But you are right: in the classical sense, Christian faith is certainly political.  It deals with human affairs, and how to organize life together.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ericdarylmeyer</title>
		<link>http://ehritzema.wordpress.com/2008/05/10/an-evangelical-manifesto/#comment-121</link>
		<dc:creator>ericdarylmeyer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 18:13:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ehritzema.wordpress.com/?p=133#comment-121</guid>
		<description>Thanks for posting these quotes and your thoughts on them Elliot.

To my mind the problem is not so much &quot;politicization&quot; of the faith, but trying to interpolate the political life of faithful Christians somewhere along the given spectrum from right to left. The faith is undoubtedly political: loving your neighbor (and insisting that he/she ought to do the same) is something like a scheme for a polis. Too many evangelicals (and me among them) have failed to imagine Christian &quot;politics&quot; as something other than arguments about state-craft.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for posting these quotes and your thoughts on them Elliot.</p>
<p>To my mind the problem is not so much &#8220;politicization&#8221; of the faith, but trying to interpolate the political life of faithful Christians somewhere along the given spectrum from right to left. The faith is undoubtedly political: loving your neighbor (and insisting that he/she ought to do the same) is something like a scheme for a polis. Too many evangelicals (and me among them) have failed to imagine Christian &#8220;politics&#8221; as something other than arguments about state-craft.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: markcole</title>
		<link>http://ehritzema.wordpress.com/2008/05/10/an-evangelical-manifesto/#comment-120</link>
		<dc:creator>markcole</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 13:01:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ehritzema.wordpress.com/?p=133#comment-120</guid>
		<description>The most important thing is that the message of the gospel goes out - whether with unselfish motives or even selfish ones.

The message of the gospel is not that the Republicans are right, but that God provides salvation to everyone who believes.

This is an important point that needs to be made right now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The most important thing is that the message of the gospel goes out &#8211; whether with unselfish motives or even selfish ones.</p>
<p>The message of the gospel is not that the Republicans are right, but that God provides salvation to everyone who believes.</p>
<p>This is an important point that needs to be made right now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
